China Correctly Interprets Syria Missile Strike During Xi Visit As Sign of Trump Weakness & US Foreign Policy Floundering

Some Chinese analysts viewed the strike’s timing as no coincidence.

Trump wants China to do more to deter the development of nuclear weapons by North Korea, its ally,

and these analysts viewed the Syria attack as a reminder to Xi that the US could also attack the North, if necessary.

[ As if they needed any reminding of that. ]

But the official Chinese account of the talks in Xinhua did not mention North Korea — a burning issue for Trump, but less so for Xi.

Analysts said the omission was probably intentional — a response to the attack on Syria.

Xinhua’s commentary on the Syria strike also made no reference to North Korea.

But it mentioned American missile attacks on Libya in 1986 and Sudan in 1998,

and scolded the US for not achieving its “political goals” in those instances.

“It has been a typical tactic of the U.S. to send a strong political message by attacking other countries using advanced warplanes and cruise missiles,” the article said.

The state-run media offered sanitized accounts of the Mar-a-Lago talks,

emphasizing the sweeping green lawns on which the leaders walked and the ornate room where the official discussions took place.

Those articles omitted the surprise of the Syria attack, in keeping with the goal of presenting an uplifting account of the two leaders meeting as peers.

Tillerson told reporters that when Trump notified Xi about the Syria strike toward the end of dinner,

Xi expressed understanding, because it was punishment for a chemical attack that had killed children.

The Chinese president very rarely talks to the Chinese or foreign news media,

making it almost impossible to determine his opinion about the attack or how he expressed it to Trump.

But Chinese analysts, whose advice is sometimes sought by the government on foreign policy questions, were scornful of the strike,

which they viewed as a powerful country attacking a nation unable to fight back.

And they rejected what they viewed as an unspoken American message equating Syria, which has no nuclear arsenal, with North Korea,

which has carried out five nuclear arms tests and hopes to mount a nuclear warhead on an intercontinental missile.

“I don’t deny the is capable of such an attack against North Korea, but you need to see that North Korea is capable of striking back,”

said Lu Chao, director of the Border Studies Institute at the Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences.

“That would create chaos.”

If Syria had nuclear weapons, the US would not dare attack it,

said Shen Dingli, a professor of international relations at Fudan University in Shanghai.

“Chemical weapons and nuclear weapons are totally different,” Shen said.

“A chemical bomb kills dozens of people, and the atomic bomb at Hiroshima killed hundreds of thousands.”

Chen added that many Chinese were “thrilled” by the attack

because it would probably result in the US becoming further mired in the Middle East.

“If the US gets trapped in Syria, how can Trump make America great again?

As a result, China will be able to achieve its peaceful rise,”

Chen said, using a term Beijing employs to characterize its growing power.

“Even though we say we oppose the bombing, deep in our hearts we are happy.”

On trade, Xi and Trump agreed to a “100-day plan” that Commerce Secretary Wilbur L. Ross said would include “way stations of accomplishment.”

US business executives took that to mean there had been no deep negotiations on whether China would further open its markets to US companies.

Business leaders had expected the Chinese to announce investments in the US that would create jobs,

as a way to offset some of Trump’s complaints about the countries’ trade imbalance.

But Xi made no such offers, at least publicly.

According to an account in Xinhua, the Chinese invited the US to participate in a program it calls One Belt One Road,

an ambitious effort to build infrastructure projects across Asia to Europe, for which China hopes it can attract some US investment.

“The Chinese did not want to create the impression that Xi went to the U.S. to make concessions to Trump, that would come across as weakness,”

said Yun Sun, a senior associate in the East Asia Program at the Stimson Center in Washington.

In the preparations for the talks, Chinese officials emphasized that they expected few concrete results

because they viewed the Florida encounter as a getting-to-know-you session between two big personalities.

In that sense, the Chinese prevailed, Ms. Yun said.

“It will be Trump who will have difficulty explaining to his voters what he got from the Chinese,” she said.

Source: After Xi Leaves U.S., Chinese Media Assail Strike on Syria – The New York Times